このブログを検索

2025年5月30日金曜日

Towards an Architecture based on Vernacular Values in the Regions: On Paradigm of Asian Studies for Architecture and Urban Planning、Keynote Speech , 6th ISAIA , Deagu, Korea

Towards an Architecture based on Vernacular Values in the Regions: On Paradigm of Asian Studies for Architecture and Urban Planning

 

Prof. Dr. Shuji Funo

Chairman of Architectural Planning Committee

Chairman of Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering (JAABE)

Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ)

Graduate School of Environmental Planning The University of Shiga Prefecture

2500 Hassaka-cho , Hikone City, Shiga Prefecture 522-8533

tel= +81-(0)749-28-8200Rep0749-28-8272 Lab. fax: 8342) e-mail funo@ses.usp.ac.jp

 

Introduction

  I have been deeply involved in urban and architectural fields in Asia for more than a quarter of a century since 1978, when we started the research project on human settlements in Southeast Asia with my colleagues of Toyo University, Japan and jointly with ITS (Institute Teknologi Surabaya) research Group leaded by Prof. Johan Silas.

I firstly carried out field survey on kampungs (urban villages)[1], the word of which OED (Oxford English Dictionary) says, is the origin of the word ‘compound’. Hearing that the enclosed living quarter in Batavia and Malacca was called ‘kampung’, Englishman began to use the word ‘kampung=compound’ to native settlement in India in early 19th century, thereafter also in Africa. I am sure now that kampung is so interesting as a model of urban community to be developed to the neighborhood unit of a new town even in another countries[2]. Anyway, the world of kampung opened my eyes to the vast field of urabn tissues in Asia.

  I wrote my doctorate thesis titled "Studies on Transitional Process of Kampung and Kampung Housing System --Considerations on Alternative Strategies for Housing"(Tokyo University) in 1987[3] and had an opportunity to build an experimental house dubbed as “Surabaya Eco House” in 1997-9 based on almost ten years of field work.

  After moving to Kyoto University, I concentrated on rural settlements in Lombok Island next to Bali Island for several years. And in that island, we discovered a unique Hindu city named Cakranegara, which soon became clear to have been established as a colonial city of Balinese kingdom named ‘Karangasem’ in early 18th century. To compare the Hindu city and Muslim city has become one of the subjects of my research from that time. The fact that the formation of Muslim quarters are very different from that of Hindu quarters in Cakranegara further expanded the field of my research. I wrote a paper[4] on Cakranegara in 2002.

  Looking for the target city next to Cakranegara, we thought of Jaipur[5], the capital of Rajasthan, India, famous as a gridiron city, which was constructed by Jai Singh II in the same early 18th century as was Cakranegara. Two cities. one of which is located at the western end, and the other at the eastern end of the Hindu civilization, were thought as two typical models of Hindu city, so we decided to develop our research field to Indian Subcontinent. We surveyed many cities as Ahmedabad[6], Madurai[7], Varanasi,[8] Lahore, Delhi, Katmandu[9](Nepal), Patan[10](Nepal), Thimi[11](Nepal) and othr towns in the region until now.

  I wrote a book titled “The City as Mandala; The Spatial Idea of Hindu City and its Transformation”(Japanese) in 2006 by picking up three cities, Madurai, Jaipur and Cakranegara and am preparing with Dr. M.M Pant to publish a book titled “Stupa & Swastika; A study on planning principles of Patan, Katmandu Valley”(English) in 2007.

  Next step had come with research project on colonial city funded by Ministry of Education and Science, Japan since 1997. We recognized the great western impact on city planning in Asia through studies on urban tissues for these years. For the first two years (1997-98), we concentrated on the British colonial cities like Munbai (Bombay), Chennai (Madras), Kolkata (Calcutta)[12], which led to the idea of modern planning method for all over the world and turn our eyes to Dutch colonial cities in Asia. AThe reason is that many cities in Asia originated from the bases(lodges, factories, forts, castles) of Portuguese and --especially, The Netherlands had been the only country for Japanese to contact the world through Dezima during 1641-1853.

  The Netherlands colonized Indonesian Archipelago and established Batavia (Jakarta) as a powerful headquarter of Dutch East India Company (VOC), which closely connected Dezima, Nagasaki, Japan to the Modern World system. We conducted field survey on Jakarta[13], Malacca, Galle, Colombo, Cochin[14], Nagapattinam[15]…Cape Town and finally stretching our legs to Dutch colonial cities in West Indies as Recife (Brazil), Paramaribo (Surinam), Willemstad (Curacao). In terms of colonial cities, we had chances twice to hold international symposia at SINICA, Taiwan[16].

  In terms of cities and architecture in East Asia, we are learning a lot from studies done by colleagues in China and Korea, through JAABE and ISAIA. I am making a study on Beijing[17], Taipei[18], and Korean cities till the moment with foreign students from Asia.

  Based on my experiences in Asian field for a quarter century, I will raise the further topics to clarify from the East.

 

テキスト ボックス:  
Fig1 Cover of “History of Urban & Architectural in Asia” by S. Funo (under translation in China & Korea)
Beyond Dichotomy of Europe vs. Asia

Western ideas, methods and techniques related architecture, building construction, and urban planning have been influential to Japan since Meiji Restoration, which is the same in Korea and China. It is notable that Chuta Itoh (1867-1952), a very unique Japanese architect & architectural historian, who was so interested in Asian architecture competitive to European architecture and traveled from Tokyo to Athens through the Eurasian Continent, western architecture is always model to follow up. He was eager to prove Goju-no-tou (a five-storied pagoda) of Horyuji temple, which is the world oldest wooden structure, is comparable to the Parthenon Temple in Athens. The dichotomy of the west and the east, or Europe vs. Asia continues to dominate our brain and frame of references. For western architects like Josiah Condor who was the first professor to teach history of architecture and building construction to Japanese, the problems in adapting the western idea and method to the local conditions was the most important issue to solve. English architects had already grappled with harmonization Indo-Saracen architecture and European architecture in India.

Chuta Itoh wrote a paper titled ‘Asia is one’ following Tenshin Okakura’s “The Ideal of East” published in London. However, It is not saying that Asia is not one. Asia has many architectural traditions region by region.

It is our task to discover indigenous principles of architectural techniques and planning methods and to clarify the relationship between regions. I wrote two text books, one is “A History of Asian Cities and Architecture”, which is now on the process of translation both in China and Korea and the other is “The Houses across the World”. I think a plenty of works to stimulate our curiosity in Asian fields are left.

How to define geographical range of Asia and how to differentiate the periods in history is an issue of primary importance. We indeed need a global view of architectural history.

I suppose the world of vernacular architecture constitutes the base of architectural development in the region. From the north to the south and from the east and west, Eurasia consists of various districts from the ecological view point. And Asia has 3 regional cores of urban civilizations, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Indus and Huang He, the influence of which extended all over Asia. Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism that rose and spread in Asia created the architectural tradition of building types needed in each of the regions. Chinese tradition of architecture and city planning is also very influential especially in East and Southeast Asia. If we see the architectural tradition in Southeast Asia, several layers of influences due to Indianization, Sinicization, Islamication, Westernization, and Modernization, could be differentiated in even one city.

What we should clarify is not one architectural system but various streams of architectural traditions in Asia.

 

Housing System based on Eco-System in the Region

 Housing and urban issues are still big problems in Asian countries, especially in developing countries. We have many problems to solve and many tasks to implement in the field of housing that require collaboration. We can learn a lot from kampungs and Kampung Improvement Program (KIP) s, which are based on own values as I mentioned above.

Urban settlements in the cities of developing countries are not the impedances to be swept away. Most of them are in poor condition physically, and economically but are not necessarily poor socially. It should be emphasized that urban settlement in the developing countries is not a slum, which shows different appearances from slums in Western cities. Destruction of social structure, bad and criminal acts etc. are not rarely seen in developing countries. Kampung is not a discriminated settlement. Kampung community has own system. When we plan and design city or urban settlement, we must respect the values urban settlement has maintained.

 The characteristics to be noticed in planning are as follows.

  (1) Variety of Urban settlements

  Each urban settlement has its own characteristics that varies according to location (distance from the city center), constitution of income groups, migratory backgrounds of inhabitants or mobility of population, its history, its spatial pattern and so on. It's very important that distribution of various urban settlements give alternatives when people choose the place to live. Even the poorest income group can find some living quarters. Some scholar insists that variety of urban settlement is only a solution to the housing problems at the moment in developing regions.

 (2) Urban Settlements and their World

  Urban settlement is not a mere residential settlements. New town in Japan, for example, is often called Bed (Dormitory) Town because it has no other functions except sleeping (staying) especially for business man. But urban settlement in general has both functions of production and consumption. The cycle from production to consumption can be a closed one within an urban settlement such as kampung. Living place is very near to workplace. Almost all the daily activities can be carried out in the neighborhood unit. It must be pointed out that urban settlement itself is parasitic to the city center, which has various facilities for job opportunity. They cannot survive without earning money from outside the kampung. But urban settlement largely forms autonomous and self-contained community.

(3) Heterogeneity of Urban Settlement

  Urban settlement like kampung forms plural society and is not a homogeneous community. Mix habitation, which means the situation various groups live together in a same area, is a characteristic of kampung. Rich people often live in next door to poor people. It should be noticed that rich people support the life of the poor even in the poorest kampungs.

 (4) Urban Settlement as a Highly Serviced Society---Hawkers (peddlers)' culture

  Everybody can get almost all the kinds of foods and goods for daily life because street vendor and peddlers are always rambling to serve the inhabitants. It is because job opportunity is very scarce in the kampung. But for the inhabitants, kampung is a highly serviced society.

 (5) Mutual Aid System

  Urban settlement like kampung communities is usually well organized. The inhabitants help themselves through the mutual aid activities, which is indispensable in the kampung life. The spirit of mutual aid characterizes kampung community.

(6) Preservation of Traditional Culture

テキスト ボックス:  
Fig2 A Kampung in Surabaya
  People tend to preserve the traditional way of life in the rural village from where he comes. Urban settlement should be considered to be a settlement that has own vernacular values.

 (7) Housing as a Process

   Housing is a process. Urban settlements are generated by accumulating infinite housing process involving all the diversities of its  inhabitants. In urban (Regional) planning or housing project, we should accept growth and a gradual process of addition in the making of an individual house.

 (8) Complicated Ownership Relations

  It is one of the major characteristics that ownership relations are complicated. It may appear as a development lag in the modern world, but complicated land ownership relations sometimes help in resisting  the urban property speculation.

I think how to evaluate these features of urban settlements is very important in planning and designing. What can we do in front of the realities of cities of developing countries? I suggest that we should follow the basic principles of urban planning below.

 

 A Autonomy & People's Participation

 B Network Structure in place of Hierarchical Structure

 C Housing by Self help and Mutual aid

 D Housing as a process

 E Housing based on vernacular value

 F Housing system based on Eco-system

 G Appropriate Technology for housing

 

We have possibilities to encounter disaster anywhere and anytime. We had earthquakes like Pakistan (2005) and central Jawa (2006). I myself fortunately could have survived from Indian Ocean Tsunami when I was on the coast in Sri Lanka on that day. Disaster housing system should be established in partnership among Asian countries.

 

Urban Resources as Mutual Heritage

Most of the big cities in Asia are becoming similar and similar because buildings are built by using the same materials and same construction techniques based on Industrialization. Buildings that formed the core of old town in Asian countries are being replaced by high-rise buildings in the same way. Even modern architecture built 50 years ago is hanging by a thread. How to preserve, conserve and revitalize the old core of the cities is one crucial problem common to Asian cities.

In case of many cities whose origins are traced back to the colonial period, the problem presents certain complications since reconstruction or preservation of colonial monuments built by Europeans recalls the memory of domination and exploitation. It is natural for Indonesian people to oppose the proposal of reconstruction of Batavia castle by the Netherlands.

  But we have a case in Sri Lanka who launches the concept of mutual heritage and dual parentage. European culture has already penetrated into most of the regions in South and Southeast Asia sometimes deeply or partially. Sri Lanka is willingly to propose, for example, Galle Fort built by Dutch is registered as a world heritage site.

テキスト ボックス:  
Fig3 Galle, Sri Lanka
  However we also have opposing instance in East Asia. Old Korean National Museum (the former Japanese Colonial Office (Chosen Sotokuhu) building) was destructed in 1995, for the 50th anniversary of liberation, which I believe is political correctness. On the other hand, the former Japanese Colonial Office in Taipei (Taiwan Sotokuhu) is still being used as home of presidents. It depends upon the case, which way people chose.

  Anyway, the periods of scrap and build have gone. How to reuse and convert the architectural stocks are important issues for the revitalization of the old urban core in Asian cities. We have many good examples in Korea.

Eco-cycled Architecture and Environmental Restoration

 We have a chance to build an experimental house called Surabaya Eco house, which aims at developing the model of collective housing in South East Asia (Humid Tropical Regions). This experimental project firstly launch the basic plan based on our previous studies on kampungs. Our proposal was luckily accepted as a project by IDI (International Foundation Development of Infrastructure), and the model house was built at Surabaya (ITS campus, Indonesia) in June 1998. We have monitored the environmental conditions of Eco-cycle House. We are thinking to try the experiment based on the analysis and to push out our model to be popularized in the near future.

The basic techniques and methods are as follows

A. Skeleton-Infill Structural Method

  We have designed a building’s skeleton of long-durable concrete structure, and partitions and exterior walls (Infill) of flexible structure to accommodate dwellers needs, allowing them to participate (Do-it-Yourself).

B.     Planning Adequate to Local Life Style

  Local life style has been given priority by enlarging sections for common use in collective houses, with broader free and common space arrangements. Private sections have been made more independent space.

C.    Passive Cooling Technology

Double Roofing

To effectively break sunlight heat, the roof has been designed as double-layered-roof with heat-insulating and air layers. The heat-insulating material has been developed of local products, coconut fiber. The air layer is placed the outer-side of heat-insulator intending quick spontaneous discharge of sunlight heat.

Windows and Outer Walls for Insulating Sunlight Heat

テキスト ボックス:  
Fig4 Surabaya Eco House
A bigger roof and deeper eaves have been built to cut the sunlight, and a wooden-side walls system not to absorb sunlight heat.

Shared Open Space Arrangements, Ventilation and Natural Lighting

The free and open air space shared in common has been utilized to secure horizontal and vertical ventilation channels. Windows have been installed on the top roof to facilitate ventilation and heat discharge, and to get natural lighting. And a 3-story high void space has been built at the center of the building.

Ventilation Channels in Private Sections

To facilitate cross ventilation in private sections, an arrangement of openings and operating system have been designed. Two openings have been installed on the outer wall, and a vent window onto commonly shared open space. The operating system has been designed to allow ventilation not only during daytime but also at night.

Cold Storage by Night Ventilation

Concrete floor slab with big thermal capacity is utilized as a cooling system. Cool air is led into rooms by the night ventilation to store the coolness in the concrete floor. This provides a coolant for the next daytime.

Radiant Cooling System by Circulating Water

  A polypropylene pipe is buried in the concrete slab floor to circulate well water for radiant cooling effect. The well water is kept in underground tank beneath the ground floor and is circulated by a solar-photovoltaic driven pump. The circulated water is reused for flushing toilets or sprinkling.

  After completion of the building, the thermal conditions have been monitored to verify the passive cooling effect. The effects of ventilating layers and heat-insulation materials are quite remarkable. The coconut fiber’s heat resistance can be estimated, and it has been proved to have good thermal properties as insulation materials. The concrete floor slab was cooled down by massive ventilation at night when temperature goes down, to determine the effects of cold storage. The daytime temperatures are about 2 degrees lower than the case without any night ventilation. The floor slab surface has a promising cooling radiation. Circulating-water radiant cooling effects fluctuate according to the water temperatures. The lower the water temperature the better the effect, but even at 28 degrees is sufficient for the radiant cooling effect.

 My experience above is still limited and has many problems to be discussed, but the so-called Eco-cycled Architecture is one of our subjects we should continue to study.

Restoration of natural environment is becoming very stimulated and standing issue for us to pursue after Cheong Gye Cheon Project, which can be truly called ‘ A Revolution in Seoul’.

It is impossible to remove elevated highway and covering of river in the city center , because heavy traffic jam should occur in most of the cities. However, the greatness of Cheong Gye Cheon Project exists not only on the point that removes high way from the viewpoint of urban landscape, but more splendidly the impact produced by the project to the city center are multiplying.

The Project declared ‘Paradigm shift of urban management-Development à High quality of life-from Functionality and Efficiency to Environmental protection and preservation and Human-oriented and Environment-friendly city, and stated Urban Rebirth Recovery of 600 year-history and culture-Rediscover of Seoul’s historical roots and original look and Cultural space for all citizens.

  It is true that structures had been beyond repair and pollution of river was very severe. Fundamental solution was needed to safety problem and improvement of quality of water.

Water supply plan for intermittent stream (water from the Han river: 120,000 ton/day, underground water from subway stations: 22,000 ton/day), waterway plan (average water depth: 40 cm, flow velocity: 0.24 m/sec) and sewer system are well planned.

  Restoration of ecological environment (wild plants along the stream, green areas for insects and birds, reservoirs for fish way and water-depth control) is bringing an immediate result. Water quality was strikingly bettered(BOD: 100~2501~2 ppm) and the number of species of fishes, birds and insects is increasing.

The most splendid experience of Cheong Gye Cheon Project is revitalization of downtown and the method to stimulate urban redevelopment of neighborhood around Cheong Gye Cheon stream. There are still sprawling commercial districts around Cheong Gye Cheon (Homes more than 200,000 merchants and 60,000shops). The areas still look like slums due to dilapidated buildings aged 40-50years, but are vital part of Seoul’s economy. Doing away with the worry about business decline during restoration project due to access difficulty, traffic congestion, noise and dust, was the key of the Project. A huge amount of time and energy were poured into collecting opinion of merchants through public hearings (More than 4,000 interviews to Organization of CGC Residents & Merchants Council and CGC Merchants Association). One of the most important effects in the Project is the process of people’s participation in this process of implementation.

 

 

Asian Traditions of Architecture and Urban Planning

When we are going to step in historical studies and field studies on Asian architecture, a huge amount of works are laid in front of us.

If I list several subjects to be pursued from a Japanese view points and concerns, followings are very attractive.

1. An Anthropology of Architecture in Asia (AAA)

Where are roots or archetypes of Japanese traditional architecture is one of our concerns. It is taught that Japanese domestic architecture have two archetypes, ground floor type (Tateana, pit house style) and raised floor type (Takayuka, highblock house style), which are thought to be traced back to two origins, i.e. the north or the west and the south. The ground floor type forms the tradition of folk houses for commoners and raised floor type forms the tradition of Shinto shrines, storages and houses for the nobles (Shinden zukuri, Shoin zukuri,…). These two traditions are, of course, related to those of China and Korean peninsula. The latter traditions are common in Austronesian world that extends from Easter Island to Madagascar Island, the origin of which is considered Taiwan or South China[19].

We have already “Encyclopedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World [20] by P. Oliver. We have to clarify various roots of architecture in Eurasian Continent.

2. World History of Buddhist Architecture

Buddhist temples introduced through Korean peninsula from China made great impacts to Japanese architecture. However, the history of Buddhist architecture is written as closed story within Japan. We need more cross cultural views. How and why, for examples, the original form of Stupa had been modified into various forms region by region should be explained interactively. As for building construction techniques, especially, Japan and Korea accepted great impacts from China and modified the form in the process to adapt to the local conditions, which is interesting subject to be studied collaboratively from broad view. 

3. The Idea of City and Cosmology in Asia

If we look at the tradition of cities in Asia, several stories are needed to be discussed. Asia is roughly divided into two areas in terms of interrelations with urban form and cosmologies. Asia has two cores, which established the idea of city, India and China. Both had strong influences to their peripheral regions. Hindu idea of City, which had been written in “Arthasastra” or “Vastusastra”s like “Manasara” and “Mayamata”, was transmitted to Southeast Asian regions like Angkor, Myanmar, Thailand, Jawa, and Cakranegara. Ancient Chinese Idea of capital city, which had been described in “周礼考工記 and implemented later in the form of Beijing, were transmitted to Korea, Japan, and Vietnam. However, in western part of Eurasia which is now mostly Islam regions, we cannot find interrelations between the form of the city and cosmology in the regions. We have to clarify the various urban traditions in Asia.

テキスト ボックス:  
Fig5 Cakranegara, Lombok
Urban tissues in Asian cities at present are also investigated carefully to propose the future of the city.

4. Modern World System and History of Modern Architecture

  Mongol united Eurasia in 13th century and the world history was thus first described. On the other hand, Europe established the so called modern world system during 1450-1640 according to I. Wallerstein. As for history of architecture, global views are needed to avoid Europe vs. Asia dichotomy. Asia has several strongholds of architectural traditions as Janet L. Abu-Lughod shows[21].

  We need to investigate the various traditions before western impact. And then, Westernization becomes common subjects to study cooperatively. We should look at what happened in Asia the process that led to the acceptance of the idea of western architecture.

  The study of colonial architecture and colonial city will contribute to the study of acculturation, which discusses the relations between the dominates vs. the dominated, European civilization vs. indigenous culture. Who accept and reject what, is the key issue. Duration of colonial periods, depth of penetration, levels of indigenous technologies,. …should be carefully compared. It is said that Dutchmen had been wearing the same clothes for the first hundred years in Indonesia. They firstly built their houses in the same way as in their homeland by conveying all the building materials from native land. The form and style of their houses, however, are not appropriate to the climate in the tropics, so they adopt the vocabularies and styles of vernacular architecture, for example, big roof that store cool airs during night is needed, gradually.

  The processes of acceptance of modern architecture in Asian regions are mostly neglected by European architects. We should know many talented western architects like McLain Pont and Thomas Kirsten who made efforts to harmonize modern technologies to local conditions.

 

  What I would like to say again is that we have many tasks to study and implement based on our own history and experience. Many important experiences are still neglected from Orientalist’s view. I really expect the role and development of ISAIA and JAABE from the bottom of my heart.

 

Notes



[1] Shuji Funo: Dominant Issues of Three Typical Kampungs and Evaluation of KIP, Peran Perbaikan Kampung dalam Pembangunan Kota, KOTAMADJA SURABAYA ITS, 1985

[2] Shuji Funo, Naohiko Yamamoto, Johan Silas: Typology of Kampung Houses and their Transformation Process A Study on Urban Tissues of Indonesian Cities, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.1 No.2, pp193-200, Nov. 2002

[3] AIJ Best Paper Award in 1991

[4] Shuji Funo: The Spatial Formation in Cakranegara, Lombok, in Peter J.M. Nas (ed.):Indonesian town revisited, Muenster/Berlin, LitVerlag, 2002

[5] Shuji Funo, Lanshiang Huan, Shu Yamane, Naohiko Yamamoto, Mohan Pant: Street Pattern Block System of Jaipur City, Rajastan, India, 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

Shuji Funo, Lanshiang Huan, Shu Yamane, Naohiko Yamamoto, Mohan Pant: Building Types and Block Pattern of Jaipur City, Rajastan, India, 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

Shuji Funo, Naohiko Yamamoto, Mohan Pant: Space Formation of Jaipur City, Rajastan, India-An Analysis on City Maps (1925-28) Made by Survey of India, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.1 No.1 March 2002

[6] Shuji Funo, Shu Yamane, Norihisa Numata, Eiji Negami: Space Formation of the Street Blocks within the Walled City of Ahmedabad (Gujarat, India), 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

Shuji Funo, Shu Yamane, Norihisa Numata, Eiji Negami: Group Form of Urban Houses of Manek Chowk District (Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India), 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

[7] Ayako Otsuji, Kiwamu Yanagisawa, Shuji Funo: Spatial Formation of Madurai, India:-Compared with Rajdhani Plan, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, AIJ, 25 May, “Global Environment and Diversity of Asian Architecture”, June 1-4, 2004, Matsue, Japan.

[8] Kiwamu Yanagisawa, Shuji Funo: Spatial Formation of Varanasi, India- An Analysis of the Urban Structure---Pilgrimage Roads, Mohalla as Community, Composition of Block and Houses, Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, “Resource Architecture and Modern Technology”, September 17-19, 2002, Chongqing, China.

[9] Mohan Pant and Shuji Funo: The Grid and Modular Measures in the Town Planning of Mohenjo daro and Katmandu Valley A Study on Modular Measures in Block and Plot Divisions in the Planning of Mohenjo daro and Sirkap (Pakistan), and Thimi (Katmandu Valley), Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.4 No.1, pp5159, May. 2005

[10] Shuji Funo, Yasushi Takeuchi, Mohan Pant: Considerations on the Distribution of Small Ritual Facilities on the Public Space in Patan (Katmandu Valley, Nepal), 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

[11] Mohan Pant, Shuji Funo: Ancestral Shrine and the Structure of Katmandu Valley Towns-the Case of Thimi, 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

Mohan Pant, Shuji Funo: Dwelling Types of the Town of Thimi, Katmandu Valley—An Analysis of Community Dwelling Clusters, Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, “Resource Architecture and Modern Technology”, September 17-19, 2002, Chongqing, China.

Mohan Pant, Shuji Funo: A Morphological Analysis of Neighborhood Structure - Toles and the Ritual Artifacts of the Katmandu Valley Towns – the Case of Thimi, ‘Special Issue The Wisdom of Asian Art and Architecture’, “ MANUSIA” Journal of Humanities, No.3 2002

Mohan Pant, Shuji Funo: A Study on the Pattern of Plot Division of Courtyard Residential Blocks of Patan, Katmandu Valley, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.3 No.1, pp197-1205, May. 2004

[12] ] Shu Yamane, Shuji Funo, Takashi Ikejiri: A Study on the Formation and the Transformation of British Colonial Cities in India-Town Planning and its Transformation after Independence in New Delhi, Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, “Resource Architecture and Modern Technology”, September 17-19, 2002, Chongqing, China.

Takashi Ikejiri, Masao Ando, Shuji Funo: An Overview of Spatial Formation and Transformation of the “Black Towns” in India, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, AIJ, 25 May, “Global Environment and Diversity of Asian Architecture”, June 1-4, 2004, Matsue, Japan.

[13] Shuji Funo Bambang F. Ferianto, Kyouta Yamada: Considerations on Typology of Kampung House and Betawi House of KAMPUNG_LUAR BATANG(JAKARTA), Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.4 No.1, pp129-136, May. 2005

[14] Kyouta Yamada, Shuji Funo: Considerations on Block Formation and Residential
Typology in Fort Cochin (Kerala, India), Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, AIJ, 25 May, “Global Environment and Diversity of Asian Architecture”, June 1-4, 2004, Matsue, Japan.

[15] KyotaYamada, Shuji Funo: A Study on the Spatial Formation of Cochin, India-Case Study of Dutch Colonial City in India, Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, “Resource Architecture and Modern Technology”, September 17-19, 2002, Chongqing, China.

[16] 布野修司、近代世界システムと植民都市の形成---Modern World System and the Formation of Colonial City, 国際学術検討会「被殖民都市與建築」---International Symposium: Urban and Architectural Histories under Colonial Rule in Asia, Taiwan, SINICA 6-7, Sep. 2000, 台湾中央研究院,200096-7

布野修司: 植民都市の文化変容―土着と外来―都市住居の形成 殖民都市的文化轉化;本土與外來—以城市居住形式為中心論述—, 「第二回被殖民都市與建築—本土文化與殖民文化—」國際學術研討會、台湾中央研究院台湾史研究所,1124,民国932004)年

[17] Yi Deng, Shuji Funo, Tsutomu Shigemura: A Study on the Block Formation and its Subdivision into the Housing Lots in the Inner City of Beijing An Analysis of Qianlong Jingcheng Quantu, Map of the Capital City of Qianlong Period (1750), Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.1 No.2, pp209-217, Nov. 2002

[18] Ming-chung Chuch, Shuji Funo, Sadahiko Tanaka: Community Organization of the Village Settlement and Service Area of Religious Centres: Si-Miao, in Konghinglie (Singdyam City, Taiwan), Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.1 No.3, pp191-198, May. 2003

[19] Waterson, Roxana,”The Living House: An Anthropology of Architecture in South-East Asia”,

[20]  P. Oliver (ed.) :”Encyclopedia of Vernacular Architecture of the World, Cambridge University Press, 1997

[21]  Janet L. Abu-Lughod,”Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D.1250-1350”, Oxford University Press, 1989.









 

2025年5月24日土曜日

インタビュー連載「日中建設交流史を考える」 第9回:布野修司 先生, インタビュアー 、市川紘司、日中建築住宅産業協議会『日中建協news』

 日中建築住宅産業協議会『日中建協news』掲載

インタビュー連載「日中建設交流史を考える」

9回:布野修司 先生

 

2023919

市川紘司

 

質問リスト(順不同)

·     戦後(1949年)生まれである布野先生は、青年時代、中国という国やその文化・社会に対して、どのような印象を持たれていましたか。とくに、10代の頃に起こった文化大革命については、どのような印象を持たれていましたか。

·     戦後日本の多くの学問分野でそうであったように、布野先生の専門領域である建築計画では、西山夘三氏をはじめ、社会主義をめざす新中国にシンパシーをもつ学者が少なからずいらっしゃったと思います。布野先生が受けた建築教育のなかで、新中国および社会主義・共産主義はどのように扱われていたでしょうか。

·     布野先生は1970年代末から東南アジアのフィールドワークを展開されていますが、中国を初めて訪問したのは何時でしょうか。また、その際の動機や印象をお聞かせください。

·     また、その後、大部『大元都市』に結実することになる中国での都市史研究をどのように展開されるようになったのか、そのあらましを教えてください。

·     1990年代なかば、布野先生は戦後日本の建築ジャーナリズムにおいて「アジアはネガティブ・タブーだった」と指摘されています。改めて、戦後日本の建築界におけるアジアおよび中国がどのように論じられてきたのか(/こなかったのか)、あるいはそうした全体的な状況のなかで、印象的なメディアの取り組みや論文があれば、教えてください。

·     布野研究室では数多くのアジア・中国からの留学生を受け入れてきていますが、そうした留学生に対する考えや印象などをお聞かせください。

·     2010年代後半からは、北京工業大学や西安工程大学で客員・特任教授をされています。中国での教育実践の感触はいかがでしょうか。また、中国の建築教育については、どのような印象を持たれていますか。

·     戦後日本は東南〜東アジア諸国に戦後賠償やODAとして建築・土木工事を実施してきました。アジアをフィールドにする研究者として、そのようなプロジェクトとの付き合いなどがあれば、教えてください。

·     1990年代以降、中国でも現代建築が盛り上がっていきますが、布野先生の視点からは、現在に至るまでの中国の同時代の建築(現代建築)はどのように見えていますか。

 

※以上の質問リストにかぎらず、当日はざっくばらんに、布野先生の中国にかんする「すべて」を聞き出せたら、と思っております。どうぞよろしくお願いします。

2025年5月21日水曜日

伊東豊雄はどこへ行く? 書評/伊東豊雄 『日本語の建築 空間にひらがなの流動感を生む』 PHP新書 (2016年11月29日)伊東豊雄はどこへ行く? 2017/02/14 | WEB版『建築討論』, 011号:2017年春(1月ー3月)http://touron.aij.or.jp/2017/02/3548

 『建築討論』011号  ◎書評 布野修司 

── By 布野修司 |  | 書評, 011号:2017年冬号(01-03月)

 

Book Review

伊東豊雄はどこへ行く?

Where Toyoo Ito is going?

伊東豊雄『日本語の建築 空間にひらがなの流動感を生む』PHP新書、20161129

 

 

台中国家歌劇院が10年がかりで竣工した。仙台で開催された第11アジアの建築交流国際シンポジウムISAIAInternational Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia)(東北大学、2016920日~23日)の基調講演の中で本人自らの説明を聞いた。現場の大変さを聞いていたのであるが、よくぞ竣工にこぎつけたと思う。この見たことのない傑作は21世紀の名建築として歴史に残ることであろう。

東日本大震災後、被災地に何度も通って「みんなの家」を被災地に建てた。そして、2012年開催の第13ヴェネチア・ビエンナーレ国際建築展に、陸前高田の「みんなの家」を出展、金獅子賞を受けた。そして、プリツカー賞も受賞した(2013年)。さらに、新国立競技場の設計競技については結果的に3度挑戦し敗れた。この間、日本の建築界の中心にいて、その一挙手一投足が注目される建築家が伊東豊雄である。

そんな伊東豊雄が2016年に立て続けに新書を出した。本書と『「建築」で社会を変える』(集英社新書、20169月)である。東日本大震災直後の『あの日からの建築』(集英社新書、201210月)と合わせると、立て続けに3冊の新書が出版されたことになる。いずれも、インタビューをもとに、編集者、企画者がまとめるスタイルである。本書のタイトル、「日本語の建築」「空間にひらがなの流動感を生む」という方向性は必ずしも詳述されるわけではない従って、伊東豊雄のこれまでの『風の変容体』『透層する建築』のような建築論を期待して読むと裏切られるが、この一連の新書から、伊東豊雄がこの間何をどう考えて、何をしてきたのか、建築家としてのある着地点に向かいつつあることを知ることができる。

  

「壁、壁、壁…。前を向いても後ろを振り返っても、右も左も壁ばかり。渡る世間は壁ばかりです。」と本書は書きだされる。壁とは、例えば、巨大な防潮堤で、「安全・安心」の壁が実は「管理」という壁と同義語で、お上が自分の管理責任を問われるときに必ず持ち出されるのが「安全・安心」の壁だという。本書は、プロジェクト毎に出会う「壁」についての物語である。

まず興味深いのは、第一章「新国立劇場三連敗」である。3連敗とは、最初のプロポーザルコンペで負けたこと、また、ザハ案への反対運動の過程で自ら提案した改修案が採用されなかったこと、さらにデザイン・ビルド方式に応募(B案)で敗れたこと、の3連敗である。

新国立競技場をめぐる問題が、建築界で深く受け止めるべき問題を孕んでいることはこの間様々な場所で議論されてきた。このWEB版『建築討論』でもまず「デザイン・ビルド方式の問題」http://touron.aij.or.jp/2016/04/1827、そして「契約方式の問題」http://touron.aij.or.jp/2016/09/2643をめぐって議論がなされている。設計施工の分離を前提とした建築家の基盤が大きく揺らぎ、設計者、施工者、そしてクライアントの関係が複雑に変化し多様化していることが確認される。ただ、建築の契約発注について、また、建築家が果たすべき役割について、必ずしも建築界が一致する方向性は必ずしも見いだせていない。

新国立競技場のコンペについては、歴史的、構造的な問題が露呈しているといっていい。別の場所でじっくり議論したいと思うが、しかしそれにしても、何故、伊東豊雄はデザイン・ビルドのコンペに応募したのか。本書を読んで初めて知ったのであるが、様々な柵(しがらみ)の中で頼み込まれたのではなく(A案一案だけではコンペが成立しないから)、コンペへの応募は伊東豊雄の方からもちかけたのだという。というのも、『あの日からの建築』において、あるいは本書においても、東京(都市)から地方へ、あるいは「新しさ」から「みんなの家」へ、自らの建築家としての方向を大きく転換したと思われているからである。その伊東が、東京のど真ん中の国家的プロジェクトに自ら挑む構図がしっくりこないのである。

伊東豊雄は、自らの案がすぐれていると、公表された点数の問題に絞って疑問を提示するが、新国立競技場のコンペの問題は点数制による評価方法を問う以前にある。コンペのフレームすなわち敷かれたレールがそもそも問題であって、敷かれたルールに乗って戦って負けたということである。結果として、ルールに従って選定しましたというアリバイづくりに参加することになった。「壁」をカムフラージュし、補強する役割である。

結局、何故、3回目の戦いに参加したのかについては、「建築に携わろうと思ったら、大手の組織系事務所に入るしかない」状況の中で「個人の建築家としてどこまでできるのかチャレンジしてみたいと思った「若い人に知ってほしかった」」というだけである。

この間の伊東豊雄の「転向」をめぐっては飯島洋一『「らしい」建築批判』(青土社、2014年)の厳しい批判があり、この書評欄でもとりあげた(「21世紀の資本と未来」https://www.aij.or.jp/jpn/touron/4gou/syohyou001.html)。繰り返しは控えたいが、飯島は、東日本大震災以前と以後の伊東豊雄の「転向」、「自己批判」、すなわち、「個の表現」「作品」としての建築を否定し「社会性」を重視する方向をよしとしながら、その「作品主義」「ブランド建築家」の本質は変わらないと批判する。そして、コンペに参加しながら改修案を提出した伊東の態度も一貫性に欠けると批判する。飯島に言わせれば、白紙撤回後のデザイン・ビルド・コンペに参加することなどもっての他ということであろう。

「仙台メディアテーク」までの伊東豊雄の建築論の展開をめぐっては、『建築少年たちの夢 現代建築水滸伝』(彰国社、2011年)で論じたが(「第三章 かたちの永久革命 伊東豊雄」)、確かに、状況に応じて状況と渡り合うその言説にはブレがある。それに付け加えることはないが、しかしそれにしても、東日本大震災後の「みんなの家」とそれ以前の作品群との間のブレ、落差は、それ以前のブレに比べて極めて大きい。ひたすら「新しいかたち」を求めてきた(「かたちの永久革命」)伊東がコミュニティ・ベースの「みんなの家」を提案するのである。

それに既存施設の改修案を提示しながらデザイン・ビルドの新築案に応募するのは明らかに首尾一貫しない。伊東に言わせれば、条件が違うのだから案が異なるのは当然ということであろうが、飯島ならずとも、戸惑わざるを得ない。

しかも、『あの日からの建築』で語った新たな建築の方向については、結局「みんなの家」しかつくれなかったと伊東豊雄はいう(第二章「管理」と「経済」の高く厚い壁 東日本大震災と「みんなの家」)。この言い方もいささか気になる。「今後、被災各地の復興は困難をきわめるだろう。安全で美しい街が五年十年で実現するとは到底思われない。しかし東京のような近代都市の向こう側に見えてくる未来の街の萌芽は確実にここにある。」と書いていたのである。釜石復興プロジェクトは挫折したという。しかし、一体何をつくりたかったのか。『「建築」で日本を変える』と言うのである。

結局、「管理」と「経済」を大きな二つの壁とする近代主義に凝り固まった思考と態度に拒まれたというけれど、何が阻まれたのか。

その昔、「近代の呪縛に放て」という『建築文化』の連載シリーズ(197577年)のコア・スタッフとして毎月のように集まっていた頃を思い出す。伊東豊雄をトップに,長尾重武[1],富永譲[2],北原理雄[3],八束はじめ[4],布野修司というのがメンバーであった。「近代の呪縛に放て」というのは田尻裕彦[5]編集長の命名であったが,近代建築批判の課題は広く共有されていた。「アルミの家」によってデビューはしていたけれど、その時点で「中野本町の家」はまだ実現はしていない。近代建築批判をどう建築表現として展開するのか、口角泡を飛ばして議論したものである。結局、振出しに戻ったということなのか?出発点にとどまっているだけなのか、何ができて何ができなかったのか。

伊東豊雄は、第三章「「時代」から「場所」へ」で、これまでの自らの軌跡を素直に振り返っている。「社会に背をむけた1970年代」から「消費の海に浸らずして新しい建築はない」といっていた時代へ、そして、「八代博物館・未来の森ミュージアム」以降、公共建築の展開がある。建築家として自作を語るというより、時代の流れとの対応が語られる。インタビュアーとの応答がベースになっているからであるが、もともと伊東豊雄は「状況」に敏感な建築家である。自ら振り返って、はっきりと「バブルの時代の東京が一番好きでした」ともいっている。そして「仙台メディアテーク」以降は、地域や場所に密着した建築を強く意識するようになるのである。

1970年代初頭、近代建築批判の流れはいくつかの方向に向かう。わかりやすいのは、近代建築の理念や規範が排除してきたもの、否定してきたものを復権することである。装飾や様式、自然やエコロジー、ヴァナキュラーなものやポップなもの、廃棄物やキッチュ、地域や伝統などが次々と対置された。そして、それぞれがデザインの問題と競われることにおいてポストモダンの建築として一括されることになる。様々な記号やイコンや装飾が浮遊するポストモダンの建築状況は、あらゆる差異が無差異化され同一平面上に並べられることによって消費される消費社会の神話の構造と照応していた。そうした中で、常に何か新しさを求めてきたのが伊東豊雄である。だから、装飾や様式、自然やエコロジー、ヴァナキュラーなものやポップなもの、廃棄物やキッチュ、地域や伝統を対置する構えはなかった。その伊東が「地域」や「場所」へ向かうというのである。

 鍵となりそうなのが「日本語の建築」であり、「ひらがなの流動感」だという。もちろん、「日本の伝統的な建築様式に戻ればいいと考えているわけではない」。「歴史や風土を踏まえたうえで、現代のテクノロジーを駆使して未来を見据えた建築のあり様をみつけ出したい」「アジアの建築家として、日本人の建築家として、一つ見えてくる道筋の先に、「日本語の空間」「日本語の建築」というあり方が存在するのではないかと考えるようになった」(序章)というのである。

「日本語の建築」というのは本書で突き詰められているわけではない。枕としてひかれているのは水村美苗『日本語が亡びるとき 英語の世紀の中で』(筑摩書房、2008年)である。これについては、「建築討論」02号「日本建築の滅びる時」宇野求・布野修司対談https://www.aij.or.jp/jpn/touron/2gou/jihyou003.html で話題にしている)が、世界語、国際語としての英語と日本語、近代建築と日本建築という単純なディコトミーに基づいて日本を対置するというのだとすれば、よくある日本回帰のパターンである。辛うじて理解するのは、「壁」によって空間を区切ってしまうのではなく、空間の連続性を保ちながら、空間に場所の違いを生み出す、壁を建てない、区切られた部屋を極力つくらない、自然の中にいるような建築、具体的には「せんだいメディアテーク」の「チューブ」や「みんなの森ぎふメディアコスモス」の「グルーブ」、振り返れば「中野本町の家」のような空間がその方向だという。


 建築の壁と「渡る世間は壁ばかり」という「壁」はもちろん違う。壁を取っ払えばいい、というわけではないだろう。近代建築批判が単にデザインの問題ではないことは最初からわかりきったことである。この「日本語の建築」は社会的な「壁」の問題にどう重なるのか。

 『「建築」で日本を変える』のあとがきに書かれているけれど、伊東豊雄は、2014年の秋から4カ月間病院生活を送っている[6]。この4カ月の膨大な時間にこれまでにつくってきた建築のこと、そしてこれからの自分の人生の過ごし方について考えたのだという。

 結局は、自らの生き方として示すしかない、ということではないか。「作品」とか「個」の表現とかを突き抜けた地平で、依拠する場所を決めたということである。そうだとすれば、伊東豊雄は変わった、あるいは着地点を見出したのである。

 最終的に行きつきつつあるのは大三島である。残された建築人生を大三島での活動に懸けたいという。伊東建築塾も大三島で行われる。大三島には土地も買った。ル・コルビュジェが晩年、モナコ近くの海辺に小屋を建て、のんびり裸で絵をかきながら過ごしたというエピソードにわが身も重ねるともいう。

 そうした中で、熊本大地震が起こった(20164月)。熊本アートポリスのコミッショナーとしては動かざるを得ない。大三島を拠点としながらもまだまだ世界中を股にかけざるを得ないかもしれない。

 しかしそれにしても、伊東豊雄のように「壁」と格闘する建築家が群雄割拠しないといけないのではないか。



[1] 1944年東京都生まれ。東京大学工学部建築学科卒業,東京大学大学院博士課程単位取得満期退学,工学博士(東京大学)。7283年東京大学助手。7778年イタリア政府給費留学生としてローマ大学に留学。'8388年東北工業大学助教授。武蔵野美術大学教授,学長。作品に「国分寺の家」(1976年)「天日向家船」(1996年)など。著書に『ミケランジェロのローマ』(1988年)『ローマ・バロックの劇場都市』(1993年)『建築家レオナルド・ダ・ヴィンチ』(1994年)『ローマイメージの中の永遠の都』(1997年)など。詩集に『きみといた朝』(2000年)『四季・四時』(2002年)『愛にかんする季節のソネット』(2002年)。

[2] 1943 台北市生まれ。東京大学工学部建築学科卒業。1967年~1972菊竹清訓建築設計事務所。1972年富永讓+フォルムシステム設計研究所設立。法政大学名誉教授。「ひらたタウンセンター」で日本建築学会賞(2003年)。著作に『現代建築 空間と方法』(1986年)『近代建築の空間再読』(1986年)『ル・コルビュジエ 建築の詩』(2003年)『現代建築解体新書』(2007年)など。

[3] 1947年横浜生まれ。1970年東京大学工学部都市工学科卒業。1977年東京大学大学院工学系研究科博士課程修了。名古屋大学工学部助手,三重大学工学部助教授を経て1990年千葉大学工学部教授。千葉大学名誉教授。『都市設計』(「新建築学大系」一七,共著,彰国社,1983年)『公共空間の活用と賑わいまちづくり』(共著,学芸出版社,2007年)など。訳書に『アーバン・ゲーム』(M.ケンツレン),『都市の景観』(G.カレン)など。

[4] 1948年山形県生まれ。建築家、建築批評家。1979年東京大学都市工学科博士課程中退,磯崎新アトリエ(担当作品ロスアンゼルス現代美術館,筑波センタービル等)を経て1985UPM(Urban Project Machine)設立。1988年熊本アートポリスのディクレクター。芝浦工業大学教授、芝浦工業大学名誉教授。作品に「白石マルチメディアセンターアテネ」(1997年)「美里町文化交流センター「ひびき」」(2002年)など。著作に『逃走するバベル 建築・革命・消費』(1982年)『批評としての建築 現代建築の読みかた』(1985年)『近代建築のアポリア 転向建築論序説』(1986年)『ロシア・アヴァンギャルド建築』(1993年)『思想としての日本近代建築』(2005年)など。

[5] 1931年生まれ。早稲田大学文学部卒業。建築ジャーナリスト。1960年彰国社入社。『建築文化』編集担当,『施工』創刊編集長を経て,1970年『建築文化』編集長(企画室長の任期を挟んで82年まで)。著書に『この先の建築』『建築の向こう側』(2003年)など。

[6] 実は、丁度その期間に滋賀県新生美術館のコンペがあり、伊東さんが選考委員会に一度も出席できず、僕は審査委員長として2段階の公開ヒヤリング方式を実現するのに孤軍奮闘することになった。この公開ヒヤリングによるコンペ方式を僕は20年前から続けているのだが、新国立競技場も何故透明性の高いコンペ方式がとられなかったのか、その組み立てにそもそも疑念がある。点数制の問題も新生美術館でも当然問題になった。

布野修司 履歴 2025年1月1日

布野修司 20241101 履歴   住所 東京都小平市上水本町 6 ー 5 - 7 ー 103 本籍 島根県松江市東朝日町 236 ー 14   1949 年 8 月 10 日    島根県出雲市知井宮生まれ   学歴 196...