このブログを検索

2026年2月23日月曜日

Speaker:Colonial Urban Heritage and Asian Urban Traditions, UrbanーCultural Research Center,Graduate School of Literature and Human Sciences, The 21st Century COE Program, International Symposium, Osaka City University, 1st Oct., 2006:大阪市立大学大学院文学研究科,COE国際シンポジウム

 SpeakerColonial Urban Heritage and Asian Urban Traditions UrbanCultural Research CenterGraduate School of Literature and Human Sciences The 21st Century COE Program International Symposium Osaka City University1st Oct.2006:大阪市立大学大学院文学研究科,COE国際シンポジウム


Colonial Urban Heritage and Asian Urban Traditions

 

Prof. Dr. Shuji Funo

Chairman of Architectural Planning Committee

Chairman of Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering (JAABE)

Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ)

Graduate School of Environmental Planning The University of Shiga Prefecture

                                                                                                              2500 Hassaka-cho , Hikone City, Shiga Prefecture 522-8533

tel= +81-(0)749-28-8200Rep0749-28-8272 Lab. fax: 8342) e-mail funo@ses.usp.ac.jp

 

Introduction

  I have been deeply involved in urban and architectural fields in Asia for more than a quarter of a century since 1978, when we started the research project on human settlements in Southeast Asia jointly with ITS (ITS Institute Teknologi Surabaya) research Group leaded by Prof. Johan Silas.

I firstly carried out the field survey on kampungs (urban villages)[1], that had decided major direction of my urban studies. The world of kampung I had encountered opened my eyes to the vast field of Asia. I am sure now that kampung is so interesting as a model of urban community to be developed to the neighborhood unit of a new town even in another regions[2]. I wrote my doctorate thesis titled "Studies on Transitional Process of Kampung and Kampung Housing System --Considerations on Alternative Strategies for Housing"(Tokyo University) in 1987[3], which is my first accomplishment and the base ever since.

  After finishing doctorate thesis, I was invited to participate in studies for Islamic city and happened to discover a unique Hindu city named Cakranegara in Lombok Island next to Bali Island, which leads me to next stage of my urban studies. To compare the Hindu city and Muslim city became one of the objectives of my research from that time. The fact that the formation of Muslim quarters are very different from that of Hindu quarters in Cakranegara leads us to enlarge the field. I wrote a paper[4] on Cakranegara in 2002.

Looking for the target city to be compared with Cakranegara, we thought of Jaipur[5], the capital of Rajasthan, India, famous as a gridiron city, which was constructed in the same early 18th century by Jai Singh II. Two cities. one of which located at the western end, and the other at the eastern end of the Hindu civilization, were thought as two typical models, so we develop our research framework to Indian Subcontinent. We surveyed cities as Ahmedabad[6], Madurai[7], Varanasi,[8] Lahore, Delhi, Katmandu[9](Nepal), Patan[10](Nepal), Thimi[11](Nepal)…..

  I recently wrote a book titled “The City as Mandala; The Spatial Idea of Hindu City and its Transformation”(Japanese) in 2006 by picking up three cities, Madurai, Jaipur and Cakranegara and am preparing with Dr. M.M Pant to publish a book titled “Stupa & Swastika; A study on planning principles of Patan, Katmandu Valley”(English) in 2007.

  Next step had come with research project on colonial city funded by Ministry of Education and Science, Japan since 1997. We recognized the great western impact on city planning in Asia through studies on urban tissues for these years. For the first two years (1997-98), we concentrated on the British colonial cities like Munbai (Bombay), Chennai (Madras), Kolkata (Calcutta)[12] in India. British have been leading modern planning method for all over the world since mid 19th century, which is familiar with us because many text books referred the modern urban planning history. I turn our eyes to Dutch colonial cities in Asia, the reason for which Asia has many cities originated from the bases(lodges, factories, forts, castles) of Portuguese and Dutch colonial cities—especially, The Netherlands had been only country for Japanese to contact through Dezima during 1641-1986.

  The Netherlands colonized Indonesian Archipelago and established Batavia (Jakarta) as a headquarter of Dutch East India Company (VOC), which closely connected Dezima, Nagasaki, Japan to the Modern World system. We conducted field surveys on Jakarta, Malacca, Galle, Colombo, Cochin[13], Nagapattinam[14]…Cape Town and stretched our legs lastly to Dutch colonial cities in West Indies as Recife (Brazil), Paramaribo (Surinam), Willemstad (Curacao). In terms of colonial cities, we had chances twice to hold international symposia at SINICA, Taiwan[15]. In terms of cities in East Asia, I am making a study on Beijing[16], Taipei[17], and Korean cities till the moment with foreign students from Asia.

 Based on my experiences in Asian field for a quarter century, I would like to raise some topics related to the subject.

 

Kampung as a World

  Kampung is so interesting as a model of urban community as I mentioned above. Kampung in Indonesian(Malaysian) language literally means ‘village’. People use the word even in urban context. Kampungan means ‘country boy’ in the city. OED (Oxford English Dictionary) says the word ‘kumpung’ is the origin of the word ‘compound’ although another theory says that derives from the Portuguese ‘campo’. Hearing that the enclosed living quarter in Batavia and Malacca is called ‘kampung’ by the natives, Englishman began to use the word ‘compound=kampung’ in India in early 19th century, thereafter also began to use the word in Africa.

Housing and urban issues are still big problems in Asian countries, especially in developing countries. I think we call the major issues to mind before discussing urban heritage. The existence of urban settlements like kampungs itself presents urban heritage, which is not the impedance to be swept away. Most of them are in poor condition physically, and economically but are not necessarily poor socially. It should be emphasized that urban settlement in the developing countries is not a slum, which shows different appearances from slums in Western cities. Destruction of social structure, bad and criminal acts etc. are not rarely seen in developing countries.

The characteristics of kampungs to be noticed are as follows. We can learn a lot from kampungs, which has own system. When we plan and design the city or urban settlement, we should respect the vernacular values urban settlement has maintained.

  (1) Variety of Kampungs

  Each kampung has its own characteristics which varies according to location (distance from the city center), constitution of income groups, migratory backgrounds of inhabitants or mobility of population, its history, its spatial pattern and so on. It's very important that distribution of various urban settlements give alternatives when people choose the place to live. Even the poorest income group can find some living quarters. Some scholar insists that variety of kampung is only a solution to the housing problems at the moment in developing regions.

 (2) Kampung as a Whole World

  Kampung is not a mere residential settlements. New town in Japan, for example, is often called Bed (Dormitory) Town because it has no other functions except sleeping (staying) especially for business man. But urban settlement in general has both functions of production and consumption. The cycle from production to consumption can be closed within the same kampung. Living place is very near to workplace. Almost all the daily activities can be carried out in the neighborhood unit. It must be pointed out that kampung itself are parasitic to the city center, which has various facilities for job opportunity. They cannot survive without earning money from outside the kampung. But urban settlement largely forms autonomous and self-contained community.

(3) Heterogeneity of Kampung

  Kampung forms plural society and is not a homogeneous community. Mix habitation, which means the situation various groups live together in a same area, is a characteristic of kampung. Rich people often live in next door to poor people. It should be noticed that rich people support the life of the poor even in the poorest kampungs.

 (4) Kampung as a Highly Serviced Society---Hawkers (peddlers)' culture

  Everybody can get almost all the kinds of foods and goods for daily life because street vendor and peddlers are always rambling to serve the inhabitants. It is because job opportunity is very scarce in the kampung. But for the inhabitants, kampung is a highly serviced society.

 (5) Mutual Aid System

  Kampung communities is usually well organized. The inhabitants help themselves through the mutual aid activities, which is indispensable in the kampung life. The spirit of mutual aid characterizes kampung community.

(6) Preservation of Traditional Culture

  People tend to preserve the traditional way of life in the rural village from where he comes. Kampung should be considered to be a settlement that has own vernacular values.

 (7) Housing as a Process

   Housing is a process. Kampungs are generated by accumulating infinite housing process of various inhabitants. In urban (Regional) planning or housing project, we should accept the gradual process of addition of the individual house.

 (8) Complicated Ownership Relations

  It is one of the major characteristics that ownership relations are complicated. It seems behind from the modern world, but complicated land ownership relations sometimes resist the speculation.

T.G. McGee use the term ‘Urban Involution’ following C. Geertz’s ‘Agricultural Involution’, which is very suggestive in discussing the future of urban community. Every city has spatial limits in size and cannot expand infinitely because of various reasons, among which ecological one is crucial. How to utilize the limited urban resources is common subject of every city. Involution, that is, evolution inward instead of extension and expansion outward seems important. Enriching and beautifying the city inside is needed besides developing the outer city. The lives in kampungs are maintained by principle of shared poverty by C. Geertz. Kampung people can survive by sharing the limited resources, proceeded our work-sharing system.

  Kampung Improvement program(KIP), which I have to neglect here, is famous as an urban strategy.

 

Historical Urban Resources as Mutual Heritage

Most of the big cities in Asia are becoming similar and similar because buildings are built by using the same materials and same construction techniques based on Industrialization. Modernization or Westernization influenced all the aspects of our daily lives and modified the structure of our cities. Looking at old urban cores in Asian cities, we recognize how we accept the European civilization and culture. However, buildings that formed the core of old town in Asian countries are being replaced by high-rise buildings. Even modern architecture built 50 years ago is hanging by a thread. How to preserve, conserve and revitalize the old core of the cities is becoming common subject in Asian cities.

We are very familiar with world history after Cristobal Colon ‘discovered’ ‘New World’ in 1492. European countries headed by Portuguese and Spain had started up activities overseas competitively. The ‘New World’ was divided into two by Tordesillas treatment in 1494, which decided the western part belonged to Spain and the eastern part belonged to Portuguese. Portuguese utilized eth existing native networks of cities in Asia though Spain planted many colonial cities newly based on laws of Indies in Latin America. After Portuguese established cities like, The Dutch attacked and deprived almost all the Portuguese outposts except Goa, Macao and so on. According to I. Wallerstein’s ‘Theory of World System’, it was the Dutch who had firstly grasped hegemony of Modern World System in 16th –17th century which is called ‘Century of Netherlands’, in advance of England. The Dutch constructed Batavia(Jakarta) in the same period when Edo(Tokyo) had been constructed and being developed. However the Dutch handed her Asian colonial ouutposts and cities over England in the end of 18th century, except the cities in Indonesia.

The age of Imperialism had come with England and France, which modified the port cities built by Portugues and the Netherlands and planted cities inland, especially in India.

The Metropolises like Kolkata, Chennnai, Munbai, New Delhi and cities in straits colony were built by the British Empire.

As a results of the long history of European expansion in Asia as mentioned briefly above, the great amount of colonial urban heritages are left in Asia.

In case of many cities whose origins are traced back to the colonial period, the problem is a little bit complicated because reconstruction or preservation of colonial monuments built by European recalls the memory of domination and exploitation. It is natural for Indonesian people to oppose the proposal of reconstruction of Batavia castle by the Netherlands.

  But we have a case in Sri Lanka who launches the concept of mutual heritage and dual parentage. European culture has already penetrated into most of the regions in South and Southeast Asia sometimes deeply or partially. Sri Lanka is willingly to propose, for example, Galle Fort built by Dutch is registered as a world heritage site.

  However we have another serious case in East Asia. Old Korean National Museum (the former Japanese Colonial Office (Chosen Sotokuhu) building) was destructed in 1995, for the 50th anniversary of liberation, which I believe is political correctness. On the other hand, the former Japanese Colonial Office in Taipei (Taiwan Sotokuhu) is still being used as home of presidents. It depends the case, which way people chose.

  Anyway, the periods of scrap and build have gone. How to reuse and convert the architectural stocks are important issues for the revitalization of the old urban core in Asian cities. We have many good examples in Korea.

 

Asian Urban Traditions

Western ideas, methods and techniques related architecture, building construction, and urban planning have been influential to Japan since Meiji Restoration until now.

The dichotomy of the west and the east, or Europe vs. Asia continues to dominate our brain and frame of references.

It is our task to discover indigenous principles of architectural techniques and planning methods and to clarify the relationship between regions. I wrote two text books, one is “A History of Asian Cities and Architecture”, which is now on the process of translation both in China and Korea and the other is “The Houses across the World”. I think a plenty of works to stimulate our curiosity in Asian fields are left.

How to define geographical range of Asia and how to differentiate the periods in history is the first issue to discuss. We indeed need a global view of architectural history.

I suppose the world of vernacular architecture as a base in each region. From the north to the south and from the east and west, Eurasia is consisted of various districts from the ecological view point. And Asia has 3 regional cores of urban civilizations, Egypt, Mesopotamia, Indus and Huang He, the influence of which extended all over Asia. Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism that rose and spread in Asia created the architectural tradition of building types needed. Chinese tradition of architecture and city planning is also very influential especially in East and Southeast Asia. If we see the architectural tradition in Southeast Asia, several layers of influences, which are Indianization, Sinicization, Islamication, Westernization, and Modernization, are differentiated in even one city.

What we should clarify is not one urban system but various streams of architectural traditions in Asia.

If we look at the tradition of cities in Asia, several stories are needed to be discussed. Asia is roughly divided into two areas in terms of interrelations with urban form and cosmologies. Asia has two cores, which established the idea of city, India and China. Both had strong influences to their peripheral regions. Hindu idea of City, which had been written in “Arthasastra” or “Vastusastra”s like “Manasara” and “Mayamata”, was transmitted to Southeast Asian regions like Angkor, Myanmar, Thailand, Jawa, and Cakranegara. Ancient Chinese Idea of capital city, which had been described in “周礼考工記 and implemented later in the form of Beijing, are transmitted to Korea, Japan, and Vietnam. However, in western part of Eurasia where is now mostly Islam regions, we cannot find interrelations between the form of the city and cosmology in the regions. We have to clarify the various urban traditions in Asia.

Urban tissues in Asian cities at present are also investigated carefully to propose the future of the city.

 

Urban System based on the Ecological Balance in the Region

 We have a chance to build so called Surabaya Eco house, which aims at developing the model of collective housing in South East Asia (Humid Tropical Regions). This experimental project firstly launch the basic plan based on our previous studies on kampungs. Our proposal was luckily accepted as a project by IDI (International Foundation Development of Infrastructure), and the model house was built at Surabaya (ITS campus, Indonesia) in June 1998. We have done to monitor the environmental conditions of Eco-cycle House. We are thinking to try the experiment based on the analysis and to push out our model to be socialized in the near future.

The basic techniques and methods are as follows

A. Skeleton-Infill Structural Method

  We have designed a building’s skeleton of long-durable concrete structure, and partitions and exterior walls (Infill) of flexible structure to accommodate dwellers needs, allowing them to participate (Do-it-Yourself).

B.     Planning Adequate to Local Life Style

  Local life style has been given priority by enlarging sections for common use in collective houses, with broader free and common space arrangements. Private sections have been made more independent space.

C.    Passive Cooling Technology

Double Roofing

To effectively break sunlight heat, the roof has been designed as double-layered-roof with heat-insulating and air layers. The heat-insulating material has been developed of local products, coconut fiber. The air layer is placed the outer-side of heat-insulator intending quick spontaneous discharge of sunlight heat.

Windows and Outer Walls for Insulating Sunlight Heat

A bigger roof and deeper eaves have been built to cut the sunlight, and a wooden-side walls system not to absorb sunlight heat.

Commonly Shared Open Space Arrangements, Ventilation and Natural Lighting

The commonly shared free and open air space has been utilized to secure horizontal and vertical ventilation channels. Windows have been installed on the top roof to facilitate ventilation and heat discharge, and to get natural lighting. And a 3-story high void space has been built at the center of the building.

Ventilation Channels in Private Sections

To facilitate cross ventilation in private sections, an arrangement of openings and operating system have been designed. Two openings have been installed on the outer wall, and a vent window onto commonly shared open space. The operating system has been designed to allow ventilation not only during daytime but also at night.

Cold Storage by Night Ventilation

Concrete floor slab with big thermal capacity is utilized as a cooling system. Cool air is led into rooms by the night ventilation to store the coolness in the concrete floor. This provides a coolant for the next daytime.

Radiant Cooling System by Circulating Water

  A polypropylene pipe is buried in the concrete slab floor to circulate well water for radiant cooling effect. The well water is kept in underground tank beneath the ground floor and is circulated by a solar-photovoltaic driven pump. The circulated water is reused for flushing toilets or sprinkling.

  After completion of the building, the thermal conditions have been monitored to verify the passive cooling effect. The effects of ventilating layers and heat-insulation materials are quite remarkable. The coconut fiber’s heat resistance can be estimated, and it has been proved to have good heat properties as insulation materials. The concrete floor slab was cooled down by massive ventilation at night when temperature goes down, to determine the effects of cold storage. The daytime temperatures are about 2 degrees lower than the case without any night ventilation. The floor slab surface has a promising cooling radiation. Circulating-water radiant cooling effects fluctuate according to the water temperatures. The lower the water temperature the better the effect, but even at 28 degrees is sufficient the radiant cooling effect.

 My experience above is so limited and has many problems to be discussed, and how to enlarge this kind of  Eco-cycled System to urban scale is important. Urban systems based on ecological balance in the regions are needed all over the world..

 



 







 

 



[1] Shuji Funo: Dominant Issues of Three Typical Kampungs and Evaluation of KIP, Peran Perbaikan Kampung dalam Pembangunan Kota, KOTAMADJA SURABAYA ITS, 1985

[2] Shuji Funo, Naohiko Yamamoto, Johan Silas: Typology of Kampung Houses and their Transformation Process A Study on Urban Tissues of Indonesian Cities, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.1 No.2, pp193-200, Nov. 2002

[3] AIJ Best Paper Award in 1991

[4] Shuji Funo: The Spatial Formation in Cakranegara, Lombok, in Peter J.M. Nas (ed.):Indonesian town revisited, Muenster/Berlin, LitVerlag, 2002

[5] Shuji Funo, Lanshiang Huan, Shu Yamane, Naohiko Yamamoto, Mohan Pant: Street Pattern Block System of Jaipur City, Rajastan, India, 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

Shuji Funo, Lanshiang Huan, Shu Yamane, Naohiko Yamamoto, Mohan Pant: Building Types and Block Pattern of Jaipur City, Rajastan, India, 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

Shuji Funo, Naohiko Yamamoto, Mohan Pant: Space Formation of Jaipur City, Rajastan, India-An Analysis on City Maps (1925-28) Made by Survey of India, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.1 No.1 March 2002

[6] Shuji Funo, Shu Yamane, Norihisa Numata, Eiji Negami: Space Formation of the Street Blocks within the Walled City of Ahmedabad (Gujarat, India), 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

Shuji Funo, Shu Yamane, Norihisa Numata, Eiji Negami: Group Form of Urban Houses of Manek Chowk District (Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India), 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

[7] Ayako Otsuji, Kiwamu Yanagisawa, Shuji Funo: Spatial Formation of Madurai, India:-Compared with Rajdhani Plan, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, AIJ, 25 May, “Global Environment and Diversity of Asian Architecture”, June 1-4, 2004, Matsue, Japan.

[8] Kiwamu Yanagisawa, Shuji Funo: Spatial Formation of Varanasi, India- An Analysis of the Urban Structure---Pilgrimage Roads, Mohalla as Community, Composition of Block and Houses, Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, “Resource Architecture and Modern Technology”, September 17-19, 2002, Chongqing, China.

[9] Mohan Pant and Shuji Funo: The Grid and Modular Measures in the Town Planning of Mohenjo daro and Katmandu Valley A Study on Modular Measures in Block and Plot Divisions in the Planning of Mohenjo daro and Sirkap (Pakistan), and Thimi (Katmandu Valley), Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.4 No.1, pp5159, May. 2005

[10] Shuji Funo, Yasushi Takeuchi, Mohan Pant: Considerations on the Distribution of Small Ritual Facilities on the Public Space in Patan (Katmandu Valley, Nepal), 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

[11] Mohan Pant, Shuji Funo: Ancestral Shrine and the Structure of Katmandu Valley Towns-the Case of Thimi, 3rd International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia 'Challenges and Roles of Asian Architecture for the New Millennium, Cheju National University, Cheju Island, Korea, 23-25 Feb. 2000,'

Mohan Pant, Shuji Funo: Dwelling Types of the Town of Thimi, Katmandu Valley—An Analysis of Community Dwelling Clusters, Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, “Resource Architecture and Modern Technology”, September 17-19, 2002, Chongqing, China.

Mohan Pant, Shuji Funo: A Morphological Analysis of Neighborhood Structure - Toles and the Ritual Artifacts of the Katmandu Valley Towns – the Case of Thimi, ‘Special Issue The Wisdom of Asian Art and Architecture’, “ MANUSIA” Journal of Humanities, No.3 2002

Mohan Pant, Shuji Funo: A Study on the Pattern of Plot Division of Courtyard Residential Blocks of Patan, Katmandu Valley, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.3 No.1, pp197-1205, May. 2004

[12] ] Shu Yamane, Shuji Funo, Takashi Ikejiri: A Study on the Formation and the Transformation of British Colonial Cities in India-Town Planning and its Transformation after Independence in New Delhi, Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, “Resource Architecture and Modern Technology”, September 17-19, 2002, Chongqing, China.

Takashi Ikejiri, Masao Ando, Shuji Funo: An Overview of Spatial Formation and Transformation of the “Black Towns” in India, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, AIJ, 25 May, “Global Environment and Diversity of Asian Architecture”, June 1-4, 2004, Matsue, Japan.

[13] Kyouta Yamada, Shuji Funo: Considerations on Block Formation and Residential
Typology in Fort Cochin (Kerala, India), Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, AIJ, 25 May, “Global Environment and Diversity of Asian Architecture”, June 1-4, 2004, Matsue, Japan.

[14] KyotaYamada, Shuji Funo: A Study on the Spatial Formation of Cochin, India-Case Study of Dutch Colonial City in India, Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Architectural Interchange in Asia, “Resource Architecture and Modern Technology”, September 17-19, 2002, Chongqing, China.

[15] 布野修司、近代世界システムと植民都市の形成---Modern World System and the Formation of Colonial City, 国際学術検討会「被殖民都市與建築」---International Symposium: Urban and Architectural Histories under Colonial Rule in Asia, Taiwan, SINICA 6-7, Sep. 2000, 台湾中央研究院,200096-7

布野修司: 植民都市の文化変容―土着と外来―都市住居の形成 殖民都市的文化轉化;本土與外來—以城市居住形式為中心論述—, 「第二回被殖民都市與建築—本土文化與殖民文化—」國際學術研討會、台湾中央研究院台湾史研究所,1124,民国932004)年

[16] Yi Deng, Shuji Funo, Tsutomu Shigemura: A Study on the Block Formation and its Subdivision into the Housing Lots in the Inner City of Beijing An Analysis of Qianlong Jingcheng Quantu, Map of the Capital City of Qianlong Period (1750), Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.1 No.2, pp209-217, Nov. 2002

[17] Ming-chung Chuch, Shuji Funo, Sadahiko Tanaka: Community Organization of the Village Settlement and Service Area of Religious Centres: Si-Miao, in Konghinglie (Singdyam City, Taiwan), Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, Vol.1 No.3, pp191-198, May. 2003

2026年2月22日日曜日

國松孝男(代表)・布野修司/松岡拓公雄/秋山道雄/三田村緒佐武/倉茂好匡/野間直彦/増田佳昭/岡野寛二/須戸 幹/岩間憲治/他,滋賀県立大学特別研究,琵琶湖自然共生流域圏の構築ー宇曽川流域圏モデルー,2009年3月

 國松孝男(代表)・布野修司/松岡拓公雄/秋山道雄/三田村緒佐武/倉茂好匡/野間直彦/増田佳昭/岡野寛二/須戸 幹/岩間憲治/他,滋賀県立大学特別研究,琵琶湖自然共生流域圏の構築ー宇曽川流域圏モデルー,20093

宇曽川(愛知川・犬上川・芹川)下流域の環境(空間・景観)形成についてのメモ













建築計画委員会春季学術研究集会・台北: 「社区総体営造(台湾まちづくり)の課題」,社区総体営造の現状と課題 ,集思会議中心ーー台大館(洛克廰),20080606

 建築計画委員会春季学術研究集会・台北: 「社区総体営造(台湾まちづくり)の課題」,社区総体営造の現状と課題 講師:社区営造学会 陳其南(国立台北芸術大学教授・元文化建設委員会主任),台湾現代建築の動向ーーーー李祖源,姚仁喜,謝英俊三人建築家を例としてーーーー, 講師:阮慶岳(実践大学副教授・建築評論家),店屋の保存と再生,講師:徐裕健(華梵大学教授・建築家),集思会議中心ーー台大館(洛克廰),20080606

2008年度建築計画委員会春季学術研究会について

 

建築計画委員会委員長

布野修司

 

 本年度は、ソウル(2006年度)、北京(2008年度)に続いて、台北で開催することになりました。前二回に続いて全く手作りの企画で、布野が発想、滋賀県立大学布野研究室が事務局を努め、先方とのやりとりのなかで詰めていくスタイルを採りました。

 もちろん、先方、カウンターパートがあっての発想です。今回のコーディネーターは、黄蘭翔(台湾大学文学部芸術史研究所)先生で、先生の存在抜きには今回の企画はありえません。

黄さん(と呼ばせて頂きます)と布野は、先生が京都大学博士後期課程の一回生に在学中からの付き合いで、黄さんが帰国後も、逢甲大学、中央研究院SINICA(台湾史研究所)そして昨年台湾大学に移られるまで一貫して、行き来してきました。黄さんは、台湾の建築史学の若手の中心的存在であり、中国建築史の大家、田中淡先生のお弟子さんでもあり、今でも、布野もまた参加している、京都大学人文研究所の研究プログラムや玉井哲雄先生が主催される日本歴史民俗博物館の研究プロジェクトに参加されており、日本と台湾を頻繁に行き来されています。

布野とはインド調査を一緒にしたことがありますし、ヴェトナム、インドネシアなどアジアへの関心を共有しています。また、植民都市研究の展開に当たって、二度も国際シンポジウムを開催、布野も喜んで参加させて頂きました。二度も以下のような基調講演をさせて頂きました。

 布野修司、近代世界システムと植民都市の形成---Modern World System and the Formation of Colonial City, 国際学術検討会「被殖民都市與建築」---International Symposium: Urban and Architectural Histories under Colonial Rule in Asia, Taiwan, SINICA 6-7, Sep. 2000, 台湾中央研究院,200096-7

 布野修司: 植民都市の文化変容―土着と外来―都市住居の形成 殖民都市的文化轉化;本土與外來—以城市居住形式為中心論述—, 「第二回被殖民都市與建築—本土文化與殖民文化—」國際學術研討會、台湾中央研究院台湾史研究所,1124,民国932004)年

 昨年、滋賀県立大学布野研究室では、台湾の澎湖島調査を行いました。この経緯については、参加の皆さんに機会を捉えて説明し、議論できればと思います。その帰り、黄さんに捕まって、台湾大学でしゃべる機会を与えられました。

布野修司(2007)、台湾大学講演、「日本の戦後建築―ポストモダン以後―」、台湾大学芸術史研究所、20071227

その時に、本企画を発案。年明けから、進めた次第。最初のメールが以下。

「布野修司先生:去年は、年末の講演会をはじめ、いろいろなお世話になり、芸術史研究所の学生さんも大変に勉強になったといったので、本当にありがとうございました。今年もよろしくお願いします。
さて、先生は言われました日本建築学会計画部会の件ですが、それを台湾大の芸術史研究所と建築與城郷と相談しました結果、台湾での協力組織は、上述の二研究所で皆様を向かえることにしたいと思っています。まず、二件ほど先生と確認したいことがあります。すなわち、具体の日にちはいつなることと、台湾側はもし、三、四人の一日分の宿泊費を負担し、その三、四人が日本建築学会の前日に先に來台して、台湾の皆様へ講演会を行うことが可能でしょうかということです。先週の月曜日から、四、五人の学生を集め、日本の皆様を迎える会を立ち上げました。これから、日本の皆様へ紹介する値にするテーマや案内する場所などを検討していきたいと思っています。取り急ぎ、上述の二件ほどのことを教えてくださいませんか。よろしくお願いします。
黄 蘭翔 2008年1月23日」

実に阿吽の呼吸というべきか、ほぼ同時時刻に、布野も黄さんに「よろしく」とメール。

引述 布野修司:
日にちは、さっきのメールに書いてあります。6月6日~8日です。
>
すごいねえ、同時に送ったみたい。 講演については、テーマを決めてください。
>
何人かに参加してもらえると思います。

ということで、台湾主催のプログラム以下が決まった次第。これこそ、相互交流である。

 

総統選を終え(企画の段階では総統選を控え)、大きく変わりそうな台湾の建築シーンはどう変貌しつつあるのか、という関心があった。101という李祖源の世界一の超高層ビルは、ともかく、伊東豊雄、高松伸などの新作が伝えられ、台湾の現代建築の動向が知りたいということがある。そして、建築計画委員会としては、社区総体営造の行方が大いに気になるところである。

今のところ、参加予定は約60人。楽しい刺激的な会になればと思う。

黄さんには結局大変なお世話をかけた。また、布野研究室出身で台北伊東豊雄事務所をサポートするベッキー・チャンこと張瑞娟Phoebe Changさんに大変な尽力を頂いた。また、参加者の先生方の様々なネットワークに助けられて、企画を完成させることが出来た。

現地との連絡、資料集の制作などで、川井操君始め滋賀県立大学の学生諸君には実にお世話になった。感謝したい。また、奔走してくれた黄さんの学生諸君に感謝したい。

 


  テーマ:「社区総体営造Community Based Development(台湾まちづくり)の課題」

 台湾において「台湾版まちづくり」ともいうべき「社区総体営造」が開始されて10年になる。その帰趨を問い、まちづくりが抱える問題を着き合わせる議論を交換する研究集会を行う。また、台湾現代建築の最前線を視察する。

 

 

日程:

6月6日(金):台北集合

16:00-18:00 研究集会(通訳:五十嵐祐紀子)

場所:台湾大学文学部視聴室 文20

議題:

社区総体営造の現状と課題 

講師:社区営造学会 陳其南(国立台北芸術大学教授・元文化建設委員会主任)

台湾現代建築の動向----李祖源、姚仁喜、謝英俊三人建築家を例として----

        講師:阮慶岳(実践大学副教授・建築評論家)

  店屋の保存と再生

   講師:徐裕健(華梵大学教授・建築家)

1830~懇親会

場所:台湾大学鹿鳴宴(中国料理レストラン)

 

6月7日(土):台北視察

830     貸切バス、台北シーザーホテルを出発

900     大陸工程ビルに集合

900-1000  大陸工程ビルを見学

1030-1200 台北101を見学

1200-1300 昼食

1330-1500 板橋林家邸宅と庭園(文化財)

1530-1700 台北廸化街

1730-1830 台北保安宮

1830     解散;貸切バスが保安宮から台北シーザーホテルへ行き

 

6月8日(日):台湾視察:自由行動 解散

南投県へ行く組(通訳:五十嵐祐紀子)

コース:

730     高雄(左営)ゆきの台湾高速鉄道に乗る

830     台湾高速鉄道台中駅に下車、改札口前に集合

850-950  台中県霧峰郷林家屋敷(地震後の再建)(文化財)

1050-1150 南投県埔里鎮新故郷文教基金会(ペイパードーム)

1250-1330 昼食

1400-1430 日月老茶場(村おこしの事例産業;お土産に紅茶を勧める)

1500-1530 邵族(台湾原住民)の家作り。設計:謝英俊

1600-1730 南投県信義郷 南小学校。設計:姜楽静

1900     台湾高速鉄道台中駅に到着

1916     台北行きの台湾高速鉄道に乗る

 


 

2008台灣大學(NTU)與日本建築學會(AIJ)學術交流會議

會議主題:

日本與台灣社區營造的對話:地震災後重建、社區營造與地域建築師(Town Architects)

議程

9:009:15 報到

9:15-9:30   開會致詞                                         

謝明良教授(台灣台灣大學)(口譯:宗田昌人先生)

9:30-11:30

日本阪神地震災後的重建——兼談台灣921地震——

講師  小林郁雄教授(日本神戶山手大學)(口譯:張瑞娟小姐)

對話人喩肇青教授(台灣中原大學)(口譯:宗田昌人先生)

11:30-12:20    中午休息

12:20-14:20

今後日本社區營造的課題

講師   宇野求教授(日本東京理科大學)(口譯:張瑞娟小姐)

對話人曾旭正教授(台灣台南藝術大學)(口譯:宗田昌人先生)

14:20-16:20

日本地域建築師(Town Architects)的可能性

講師   布野修司教授(日本滋賀縣立大學)(口譯:張瑞娟小姐)

對話人黄聲遠建築(口譯:宗田昌人先生)

16:20-17:20     総合討論(口譯:宗田昌人先生、張瑞娟小姐)

引言人: 夏鑄九教授(台灣台灣大學)

布野修司教授

時間:200865()一天                                          報名表:詳附件

地點:台灣大學文學院二樓會議室           報名表回傳信箱:mchsueh@hotmail.com會議語言:日文與中文(現場口譯)                               聯絡人:薛孟琪小姐

 

 

主辦單位:  日本建築學會建築計畫委員會

國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所

國立台灣大學藝術史研究所


2008年度建築計画委員会春季学術研究会報告

建築計画委員会

 

台湾において「台湾版まちづくり」ともいうべき「社区総体営造」が開始されて14年になる。その帰趨を問い、まちづくりが抱える問題を突き合わせる研究集会「社区総体営造(台湾まちづくり)の課題」を668日台北―台中で開催した。また、この開催に先駆けて台湾大学・建築與城郷研究所+芸術史研究所主催による国際シンポジウム「日本與台灣社區營造的對話:地震災後重建、社區營造與地域建築師(Town Architects)」(台湾大学総合図書館B1国際会議庁、65日)が開催された。合わせて以下に報告したい。2つのプログラムを企画・組織頂いたのは、黄蘭翔先生(台湾大学芸術史研究所)と研究室の若い学生、院生のみなさんである。

 

日本與台灣社區營造的對話:地震災後重建、社區營造與地域建築師(Town Architects)

 台湾大学芸術史研究所所長・謝明良先生の開会の辞(通訳:宗田昌人)で始まったシンポジウムは、9:30から18:00までたっぷり行われた。プログラムは以下の通り。9:30-11:30 「淡路震災とその後の街づくり」―台湾921大震災との比較― 講演:小林郁雄。コメント:喩肇青(中原大学)12:20-14:20:「日本の街づくりのこれからの課題」講演:宇野求。コメント:曾旭正(台南芸術大学)/14:30-1630 「日本におけるタウンアーキテクトの可能性」講演:布野修司。コメント:黄聲遠(建築家)16:30-18:00総合討論夏鑄九(城郷與建築研究所)、布野修司

地域をベースにした日本のまちづくりが本格的に始まるのは1995年の阪神淡路大震災以降である。ヴォランティアの出現、NPOの法制化がその方向を示している。一方、台湾で社区総体営造が開始されるのは1994年のことである。そして、921集集大地震(1998年)を経験している。震災復興については、相互に経験を交流してきた。折しも、中国四川大地震が起こった直後である。議論は熱の籠もったものとなった。小林郁雄先生の復興まちづくり、宇野求先生の日本橋でのまちづくりは、台湾の聴衆を大いに刺激した。台湾の自治体や建築家の取り組みにも同じような流れがあり、共感するところが多かった。とりわけ、若手建築家、黄聲遠さんの宜欄での活動はまさにタウンアーキテクトの仕事と呼びうるものであった。現地に住み込み、現場で考え、自らの手作りでまちづくりを続ける黄聲遠とその仲間たちの活動は台湾で大きな関心を集めている。建築、都市計画分野における台湾屈指の理論家、夏鑄九の総括も含めて相互に多くを学ぶことが出来たように思う。黄蘭翔先生、伊東豊雄の台中オペラハウスの設計を協働する、京都大学布野研究室出身の張瑞娟さん、夏鑄九研究室の博士後期課程に在籍する宗田昌人さんのすばらしい通訳に感謝したい。

 

 「社区総体営造(台湾まちづくり)の課題」

第一日(66日)、春季学術研究会のプログラムは以下の通りであった。司会を山根周先生(滋賀県立大学)が勤め、台湾大学城郷與建築研究所の博士課程に留学中の五十嵐祐紀子さんに通訳をお願いした。

社区総体営造の現状と課題」講師:社区営造学会、陳其南(国立台北芸術大学教授・元文化建設委員会主任)、「台湾現代建築の動向---李祖源、姚仁喜、謝英俊三人建築家を例として--- 講師:阮慶岳(実践大学副教授・建築評論家)、「店屋の保存と再生」講師:徐裕健(華梵大学教授・建築家)

 陳其南先生は社区総体営造の仕掛人である。阮慶岳先生は小説家でもあり(邦訳もある)、若手の建築評論家である。徐裕健先生は、老街の再生に取組む。黄蘭翔先生のすばらしい人選であった。短い時間であったが、台湾における新たな動きとその背景を実によく理解することが出来た。

 続いて、懇親会を開いたが、今年も国士舘からの18名を含めて多くの学生の参加があった。全く意図しなかったことであるが、若い学生たちの眼をアジアに開くいい機会になっている。参加者は58名、日本を離れて、議論をするのはいつも新鮮である。(布野修司、建築計画委員会委員長)

 

 台北視察

2日目(6月7日)は台北の現代建築や歴史的建築、下町の視察見学ツアーを行った。大陸工程ビル→台北101→中山公会堂(昼食) →板橋林家邸宅と庭園→台北廸化街→台北保安宮の順にバス2台で巡回した。

 大陸工程ビルの設計は姚仁喜(大元建築及設計事務所主宰)Exoskelton(外骨格)という構造設計手法による外観と、それによって可能となる内部の26m×26mの無柱空間が特徴的である。台北101は台北市信義計画區の南部、台北世界貿易センターに隣接する李祖原設計の101階建ての超高層ビルである。現在、世界一の高さの「使用中」ビルである(現在ドバイに建設中のビルがこの高さを凌いでいる)。世界最大の揺動式チューンド・マス・ダンパーがとてつもなく大きかった。構造体の大部分を内部に納め、ガラス壁に7度の傾斜をもたせることで得られる鳥瞰的な視界は圧巻。 台北市中心の延平南路に位置する中山公会堂は、辰野金吾に師事し台湾建築学会を創設した井出薫によって日本統治時代に建てられた。建築的には折衷主義であり、平面の対称性や正面の破風のような表現に見られる様式建築的なものと、水平線や垂直線の多用などの現代的な影響も見られる。林本源園邸は林本源一家により1893年に造園された歴史的名園で、台湾に現存する最も完全な園林建築である。中国庭園の伝統を受け継いだものであるが、三角形、平行四辺形の建物などやりたい放題の印象である。廸化街1850年代に建設され店屋街である。連棟式店屋(ショップハウス)の建築形式は、閩南式・洋楼式・バロック式・モダニズム式の4種類に分類される。保安宮は淡水河と基隆河の合流点に位置し、龍山寺、清水巌祖師廟と並び台北の三大廟と称せられる。建築形式としては、前殿、正殿、後殿という清朝末期の典型である三殿式である。精微で色彩豊かな装飾や彫刻からは台湾の文化が伝わってきた。

台北はとても湿度が高く、ゴキブリが大きく、南国気候だった。歴史的街並みと建造物、そしてそのすぐ背後にある都市化した市街地との対比が印象的だった。日本統治期の建物や古い街並みが保存されながら、活気に満ち溢れていた。(鮫島拓、滋賀県立大学大学院)

 

南投県視察

3日目(6月8日)は自由参加のバスツアーによる南投県(台湾唯一の内陸県)視察。今回の焦点となった1999年の集集地震の復興まちづくりの事例を見学した。参加者は先生・学生35名。このツアーのコーディネートをして頂いたのは台湾大学の学生である。

 南投県へは、まず20071月に開通した台湾高速鉄道(新幹線)にて台中へ向かう。台北と高雄を最速96分でつなぐというから驚きだ。建築家・伊東豊雄による話題の「台中メトロポリタンオペラハウス」や「高雄スタジアム」が進行プロジェクトとして挙げられるが、南へのアクセスは大分楽になった。

台中県霧峰郷林家屋敷(地震後の再建)(文化財)は、18世紀中ごろ大陸より渡り一代を築いた台湾屈指の旧家である。19世紀後半に建てられた邸宅群は、1945年日本敗戦後、国民党によって破壊され、1990年からようやく母屋を中心とした最も古い建物群を対象にした復元工事が行われ、99年にほぼ完成、その矢先、大地震に見舞われ、建物群は全壊した。「三落大宅院式」という建築形態をとるが、結婚式や劇などに使われ、舞台を囲む三方が観覧席となる。住宅内の欄間や戸には木の彫刻細工が施されていたが、元のまま残っている部分と新たに継ぎ足した部分が木の色合いらみてとれた。伝統的な職人技術の継承が困難になっている中で、当時の繊細な彫刻を残していく意味は大きい。邵族は、10数余の台湾原住民のうちのひとつであり、山間部の台湾最大の淡水湖、日月潭沿いに居住している。邵族はかつて半農半漁で生計を立てていたが、日拠時代や国民党時代を経て居住地移転や漢化政策による生活困窮など、徐々に離散していった。震源地から10kmほどの日月潭は壊滅的な被害を受けた。邵族の住居も80%が全半壊した。建築家・謝英俊は「部族コミュニティ再生」を基本方針に、震災復興住宅を計画した((サオ)(台湾原住民)の復興村)。邵族にとって重要な伝統的に行われている祭事のために、広場を計画している。また、軒を深めに出すことで、半屋外の軒下空間が隣近所との相互交流を生むきっかけとなっている。構造は軽量鉄骨のフレームをベースとし、セルフビルドで行われた。南投県信義郷潭南小学校女性建築家・姜楽静の設計である。伝統的な家屋が設計の発想であり、学校を「家」のように捉えていた。敷地が45m×70mと普通の1/3程度しかないため、建物を敷地に対して真ん中に据え、建物の周りがトラックとなっている。

台湾は、もともと地形や土壌、気候上、お茶の栽培が適していて、小葉のウーロンや大葉のアッサムまで数多くの茶葉が生産できる。日月老茶場では店舗や飲食店を併せ持つ茶葉の工場を見学した。倉庫のような外観とは対照的に現代的な店舗空間、2階に上がると食事ができるスペースになっている。

 19951月阪神淡路大震災直後、神戸市長田区に建てられた坂茂設計による仮設の教会が、2005、台湾南投県埔里鎮桃米村に多くのボランティアの協力の下移設された。はるばる日本からやってきたペイパードーム(南投県埔里鎮新故郷文教基金会)がまちづくりの拠点となって、食之坊工之坊などと共にまちを活気づけていければと思う。

この日は農暦55日で、「端午の節句」子供の日であった。台湾では都会に出た者も田舎へ帰り、家族でお祝いし、粽(チマキ)を食べることが習慣である。今回、視察のラストは粽を中心としたおもてなしをして頂いた。20種類近く存在するというを観光資源としているこの地域ということで、蛙の様々なトーンの鳴声がわたしたちを迎えてくれた。(美和絵里奈、滋賀県立大学大学院)


布野修司 履歴 2025年1月1日

布野修司 20241101 履歴   住所 東京都小平市上水本町 6 ー 5 - 7 ー 103 本籍 島根県松江市東朝日町 236 ー 14   1949 年 8 月 10 日    島根県出雲市知井宮生まれ   学歴 196...